spot_imgspot_img
spot_img
Home Blog Page 4756

India planning new action, claims Pakistan; MEA calls it ‘war hysteria’

0

Pakistan on Sunday claimed India was planning new “action” between April 16 and 20, and summoned the Indian deputy high commissioner Gaurav Ahluwalia and issued a demarche warning New Delhi “against any misadventure”.

At a press conference in his home town of Multan, Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi said the Pakistani government had “reliable intelligence that India is devising a new plan”.

“A new mishap could be staged… And its purpose will be to justify their (India’s) offensive against Pakistan and to increase diplomatic pressure against Islamabad,” Qureshi alleged.

“If it happens, you can imagine the impact of the occurrence on the peace and stability of the region. According to our information, the action could be taken between 16 and 20 April,” Qureshi claimed, adding that Pakistan was preparing to respond.
In a sharply-worded reaction, Ministry of External Affairs official spokesperson Raveesh Kumar said: “India rejects the irresponsible and preposterous statement by the Foreign Minister of Pakistan with a clear objective of whipping up war hysteria in the region. This public gimmick appears to be a call to Pakistan-based terrorists to undertake a terror attack in India.”

Kumar added, “India reserves the right to respond firmly and decisively to any cross-border terrorist attack.”

Qureshi said Pakistan had already briefed the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council on the matter, and put Islamabad’s apprehensions before them. “We want the international community to take notice of this irresponsible behaviour and reprimand them (India) for taking this route,” he said.

Qureshi also criticised the global community for keeping silent after India violated Pakistan’s territory on February 26 by striking Balakot.


Hours later, the spokesperson for Pakistan’s foreign ministry, Mohammad Faisal, posted on Twitter, “Indian DHC was summoned for demarche in line with FM’s briefing of today and warned against any misadventure.”

Tensions escalated sharply after India conducted airstrikes against a Jaish-e-Mohammad camp on February 26, days after the February 14 terrorist attack on CRPF personnel in Pulwama. On February 27, Pakistani jets entered Indian airspace to carry out air action.
While the situation has eased considerably over the last few weeks, Sunday’s developments are likely to once again raise the temperature.

The MEA spokesperson said, “It has been made clear to Pakistan that it cannot absolve itself of responsibility of a cross-border terrorist attack in India. No attempt at creating an alibi for its complicity in such attacks will succeed. Pakistan needs to take credible and irreversible steps against terrorism operating from all territories under its control rather than making hysterical statements to obfuscate the core issue that bedevils our region: cross-border terrorism. Pakistan has been advised to use established diplomatic and DGMO channels to share any actionable and credible intelligence it has about imminent terror attacks.”


Courtesy The Indian Express

Day 1 of J&K highway ban: Parties protest, Mehbooba threatens to take govt to court

0

As the Jammu and Kashmir government’s order banning movement of civilian vehicles on the highway between Udhampur and Baramulla went into force Sunday, political parties took to the roads “defying” official orders, and called for the revocation of the ban.
Former Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti said she would challenge the government’s order in court, and urged the people to defy the ban on civilian traffic.

“If the Government of India thinks that by doing such things they can suppress the people of the state, they are wrong. We are defying this order and also filing a petition in court tomorrow. Kashmir belongs to Kashmiris, and for them to have to seek permission to use their own roads, I will not let this happen,” Mufti said in Panthachowk on the outskirts of Srinagar.

“Protested against Guv [Governor] admins [administration’s] callous & absurd ban today. How can you restrict civilian movement on our main highway? You want to smother Kashmiris, change the demographics of the state & imprison them in their own land? Over my dead body,” she posted on Twitter after the protest.

National Conference president Farooq Abdullah too hit the streets in protest, and to call for the revocation of the order. He demanded to know whether Kashmir was a “colony”, and said, “This is a wrong order, they need to take it back. It seems like an order of a dictatorship. They should use the train or travel at night if troops need to be moved.”
People’s Conference chairman Sajad Lone said on Twitter: “The highway ban is now turning into a humanitarian disaster. Flooded [with] calls from across the state. People in dire need to travel in order to tend to their day to day needs of survival stuck in a state of helplessness. @jandkgovernor urgently needs to scrap the inhuman order.”

The order issued by Governor Satya Pal Malik’s administration on April 3 seeks to make it easier for convoys to move between the winter and summer capitals of the state by stopping all civilian traffic on a 270-km stretch of the national highway on Sundays and Wednesdays.

The order has cited “Parliamentary Elections and associated possibility of any fidayeen terror attack on Security Forces’ Convoys,” as justification for restricting civilian traffic on the highway on the specified days of the week till May 31.

VVIPs are outside the purview of the ban, “subject to movement of traffic”, a senior government official said. As such, National Conference vice-president Omar Abdullah was allowed to travel to Uri in North Kashmir, and Mufti to Beerwah in Budgam district, to campaign for the Lok Sabha elections Sunday.

The administration has made exceptions for schoolchildren, government employees, emergency services, and tourist vehicles, after due scrutiny. Magistrates have been appointed to facilitate movement of traffic where needed.
Srinagar Deputy Commissioner Shahid Iqbal Choudhary told The Indian Express, “There is no requirement of a pass to be issued. Convoy movement is not all day and there are officials stationed at designated locations to allow civilian traffic to move after a convoy leaves. There are delays but it is not a blanket ban.”

The civilian population has been informed that passes can be sought from magistrates deployed on the spot or from the offices of district magistrates in the districts along the national highway. Magistrates were also issuing one-day-passes to passengers who needed to travel on the highway in case of emergencies.

In an official release Sunday evening, the J&K government said “elaborate arrangements (had been) made by the Government for the convenience of the public”.

“From the overall proceedings of the day, it appears that the movement of vehicles was hassle free, although heavier on alternate routes,” the release said. “As per the reports gathered from the DCs of Pulwama, Anantnag, Budgam, and Baramulla, special permission passes were given to 128, 210, 45, and 110 vehicles, totaling 493 vehicles, falling in the exempted categories.”

The government also said that a very large number of vehicles were allowed to cross the national highway at various crossings in all districts, adding that in Srinagar, over 2,000 civilian vehicles crossed Panthachowk for various destinations along the highway.

While the highway was closed to civilian traffic on Sunday, there wasn’t any extra movement of Army and paramilitary convoys from Jammu to Kashmir. “It was a little less than the routine movement,” a senior police officer posted on the highway told The Indian Express. “Only one Army convoy — of less than 30 vehicles — entered the Valley, and we are expecting one more convoy by the evening,” the officer said.

Courtesy The Indian Express

Pakistan F-16 controversy: Three key questions, evidence on the ground and in the air

0

The air action on February 27 — which took place the day after the Indian airstrike on the Jaish-e-Mohammad camp in Balakot in Pakistan’s Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province — in Nowshera sector near the Line of Control (LoC) remains mired in controversy.

There are three major questions — first, whether the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) used an American F-16 fighter jet during the air action; second, whether this usage amounted to a violation of American sale conditions for the F-16 aircraft; and third, whether Pakistan lost an F-16 in the dogfight.

Use of F-16

Although the director-general of Pakistan’s Inter Services Public Relations had initially said that Pakistan did not use the F-16 in the air action, it has now been established that the PAF did, in fact, use the American-made warjet that morning. India had presented evidence that included the wreckage of a fired AIM-120 AMRAAM missile that fell on the Indian side of the LoC that shows the use of F-16 aircraft. Among all the aircraft in PAF’s inventory, only the F-16 is capable of firing the beyond-visual-range air-to-air missile, which was supplied to it by the US in 2011.
The IAF also had electronic signatures and radio intercepts which proved that F-16s were part of the big package of PAF fighter jets that bombed military installations in Rajouri sector. Faced with overwhelming evidence, Pakistan issued a long-winded statement last month, indirectly conceding that it had used the F-16 during that air action.

The PAF’s use of the F-16 in the attack is contentious because certain restrictions were imposed on the use of these aircraft when they were sold by the US to Pakistan. Those conditions, which are part of the End User Monitoring Agreement (EUMA) or Extended End User Monitoring Agreement (EEUMA) signed at the time of the sale of the aircraft, have not been made public.

There were few restrictions on the F-16 sold in the late 1980s to Pakistan, but it is believed that once they were upgraded in Turkey a few years ago, certain conditions may have been imposed on them. As far as the F-16 C/D Block 52 fighter received by Pakistan during the Global War on Terror are concerned, these were paid for with American money and the sale conditions were extensively debated in the US Congress. It is believed that certain restrictions were imposed on their use, including on modifying them for the delivery of nuclear weapons.
US sources have said that the American sale conditions specify that the use of the F-16s must be limited to self-defence. However, such terms, unless explicitly and clearly defined, are vague and open to interpretation. Pakistan could argue that it used the F-16 in a self-defence role after India launched the airstrike on Balakot, or that even when employed in the aerial attack on Rajouri, the F-16s were used only for self-defence. Such a claim would make it very difficult for the US to impose a penalty on Pakistan.
Jet downed?

The final question is about the IAF claim that Wing Commander Abhinandan shot down an F-16 before he was himself shot down and taken captive. India has officially claimed this “kill” while Pakistan has denied it from the day of the air action. India’s claim is based on circumstantial evidence, which includes contradictory official Pakistani statements, the electronic signature of the PAF aircraft, images from Electronic Support Measures of AWACS, crash site debris which showed parts that did not belong to the Mig-21 Bison that Wg Cdr Abhinandan was flying, radio telephony intercepts which showed that one aircraft did not return, and wireless intercepts of Pakistani army units by the Army. Any conclusive proof that a F-16 was shot down — the camera and radar image — was lost with the crash of Wg Cdr Abhinandan’s Mig-21 Bison that crashed on the Pakistani side of the LoC.
An article published in Foreign Policy magazine Friday claimed that the US had counted the F-16 aircraft with the PAF and found none of these jets in its inventory missing. The report cited unnamed Pentagon officials as saying that the counting was done on Pakistan’s request as part of the end user agreement, and took some time as the aircraft were deployed. The report also quoted US officials as saying Pakistan did not violate any sale conditions of the F-16 by using them against India on February 27.
But on Saturday, a Pentagon spokesperson was quoted as having said that the US Defence Department “weren’t aware of any investigation like that”, while referring the query to the US State Department. The State Department, however, was quoted as having said that “As a matter of policy, the Department does not publicly comment on details of government-to-government agreements on end-use monitoring of US-origin defence articles.”
Courtesy Indian Express

IPL 2019, RR vs KKR: Knights oblige Royal generosity

0

One look at the pitch and it became clear that Rajasthan Royals were playing generous hosts. The dry pitch, with the ball turning appreciably, played right into Kolkata Knight Riders’ hands.

The visitors had more than enough to take advantage of conditions. In Sunil Narine, Piyush Chawla and Kuldeep Yadav kept a tight leash on batsmen – the first two conceding less than six runs to the over. Chawla has been around the paddock for a long time, but is often overlooked. However, he has seldom let KKR down. Harry Gurney, who came into the XI in Lockie Ferguson’s place, runs in from a longer distance, but the pace on the ball is closer to that of tweakers. Thus 80 per cent of the overs provided hardly anything for the batsmen to work with. To exacerbate Royals’ woes, the only genuine quick bowler on show, Prasidh Krishna continued to impress with his pace and clear thinking, despite being a bit off the mark towards the end.

Another factor in KKR’s favour is that baring a couple of batsmen, the Royals’ batsmen struggled to score freely against the lavishly turning ball. Steve Smith top-scored with a 73 off 59 balls, but the innings was more a sheet-anchor effort rather than a dominant one. The Royals lost just three wickets, but at no stage did they look in control of proceedings. What they reached in the end could have been a tricky target, but KKR showed they have all boxes ticked at the moment.
Ajinkya Rahane has had one significant innings this season, and on other occasions has neither managed to stay till the end, nor make the desired impact in terms of the scoring rate.

Chawla opened the bowling and despite Jos Buttler being in the middle, kept a lid on the scoring. The marauding Englishman, who has generally been difficult to bowl to in the Powerplay, failed to come to grips with the difficult conditions. He stayed at the crease for almost 12 overs, but barely managed to score at more than a run a ball.

After Buttler’s departure, Smith decided that he had to stay till the 20th over for the Royals to post any sort of challenging total, as they didn’t have the sort of firepower needed at the back end to score freely on the pitch provided for the game. His first IPL half-century since the 2017 season was by no means fluent, and he only reached the landmark off 44 balls, when Krishna returned to add some velocity on the ball. Rahul Tripathi and Ben Stokes have risen to the challenge on precious occasions, but it didn’t happen on Sunday.

The England all-rounder, especially, has flattered to deceive this term and needs to contribute more before he and Buttler leave for World Cup preparatory camp.

Gurney was a revelation as his change of pace and variation caught batsmen by surprise. He took two wickets for just 25 runs and gave Dinesh Karthik and the team management another viable option. The English left-armer is already a serial winner on the T20 circuit with titles in the Big Bash (Melbourne Renegades) and Pakistan Super League (Quetta Gladiators), and going by the start that the Knight Riders have made, a three-peat is not out of the question.

Opening salvo flattens Royals

Another reason for the pitch playing into the visitors’ hands was the disparity between the spinners from both sides. Krishnappa Gowtham, Shreyas Gopal and Sudhesan Mithun were nowhere near the pedigree of Narine, Yadav and Chawla. Royals tried to hit KKR’s openers with spin, but forgot that Sunil Narine – who opened with Chris Lynn – is comfortable against such an attack.

He took down Gowtham in his first – and what transpired to be his only – over for 22 runs and the result was never in doubt from thereon. Their 91-run stand finished the match as a contest.

It proved that despite all talk of consolidation and percentage play, it two batsmen looking to hit every ball to the boundary and beyond stay in for a while, it makes a mockery of all scenarios. Lynn and Narine don’t have techniques approved by purists, but on Sunday they showed why KKR have kept them at the top of the order.

It was a question of when, and not if, and Kolkata put the hosts out of their misery in 13.5 overs, doing their own net run rate no harm at all. And for a change, they didn’t have to rely on Andre Russell’s pyrotechniques.

Aparty from Jofra Archer, the Royals didn’t have anyone who could hurry up the two batsmen intent on going for a big shot almost every ball. Dhawal Kulkarni is just the sort of bowler Lynn enjoys – a metronomic medium pacer who provides few surprises. Even when he did manage to breach the Australian’s defence, the bails moved but refused to be dislodged.

It showed what kind of day the two teams were having. While the Royals look likely to be fighting with Bangalore at the basement of the league, KKR seem set to contest for bigger glories this season.

Eye on polls, J&K restores security of ‘hundreds’ of netas

0

NEW DELHI: With the election process underway, the Jammu & Kashmir government has decided to restore the security of a large number of political persons which was withdrawn over the past few months as part of a review aimed at curbing “inappropriate usage of scarce police resources”.

“The security cover of a large number of political persons in J&K is being restored partly due to elections as they will be required to campaign amid terrorist threats and partly due to the threat that they face,” a senior intelligence officer told on Sunday.

The J&K government had withdrawn security cover from 919 “undeserving” people since it came under governor’s rule last year, freeing 2,768 police personnel and 389 vehicles for regular police duties. There were 22 separatist leaders among 919 people whose security was withdrawn. Sources said this was a clear message to those indulging in anti-national activities.

(Times Of India)

Mirwaiz leaves for Delhi to appear before NIA

0

Hurriyat Chairman, Mirwaiz Umar Farooq leaves from his residence in Srinagar for Delhi. He will appear before the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in connection with a alleged terror funding case

Mirwaz Umar Farooq to present himself for investigations at NIA headquarters in New Delhi today, appeals people back home to stay calm and peaceful.

PDP leader briefly detained in J-K’s Kishtwar

0

Jammu, Senior PDP leader and former MLC Firdous Ahmad Tak was briefly detained Sunday along with several of his supporters in Kishtwar district for trying to defy a ban on movement of civilian traffic on the Jammu-Srinagar National Highway, officials said.

Authorities have ordered the closure of the Jammu-Srinagar Highway for all kinds of civilian traffic from Udhampur to Baramulla every Sunday and Wednesday in order to facilitate movement of security forces for Lok Sabha election duty. It will remain effective till May 31.

Tak and his supporters were detained at a check point in Kishtwar district when he tried to move towards Jammu in violation of the government order, which came into force on Sunday morning, the officials said.

However, he and his supporters were later released.
Prior to his detention, Tak had staged a demonstration and demanded a review of the order. “We cannot remain mute spectator to the oppressive order,” Tak said. PTI

Hurriyat (M) executive members to accompany Mirwaiz to Delhi for NIA questioning

0

Srinagar, Apr 07 : A crucial meeting of Hurriyat Conference (M) Executive members including chairman Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, Prof Abdul Ghani Bhat, Bilal Ghani Lone, Masroor Abbas Ansari was held at the residence of Mirwaiz Umar Farooq after the third summon was sent to him by NIA to come to New Delhi for questioning as witness. The meeting strongly condemned the move and said that the Chairman was being deliberately harassed and there was an effort to criminalize leadership for their political stand. They said that Hurriyat Conference (M) is a political coalition of political parties striving for the peaceful resolution of the Kashmir issue and to associate it with anything to do terror is ridiculous and deliberate victimization for our political ideology.

Hurriyat (M) said It’s unfortunate that while they have always maintained that Kashmir is a political issue that needs resolution peacefully and humanely and always worked towards that end and walked the talk in that regard by welcoming and participating in every effort at dialogue between the stakeholders yet rulers of the day are resorting to such tactics to harass and intimidate them under the garb of legality.

Hurriyat Conference (M) said that despite having nothing to do with the matter yet the Mirwaiz through his legal council had said that he was ready to cooperate in the investigation but had asked the agency to hold it in Srinagar as he had several genuine concerns including serious security concerns in New Delhi. Hurriyat (M) said that NIA has refused to conduct the investigation in Srinagar but said in the notice that it would take care of his security concern. Hurriyat Conference (M) said that it is unfortunate that they did take into account the other concerns and are insisting on investigation in Delhi. Hurriyat (M) said that the meeting decided that they will all accompany Mirwaiz to New Delhi for the investigation.

Hurriyat Conference (M) said that they know that people are anguished and concerned for the Mirwaiz as their religious emotions are also attached to him as Mirwaiz-e-Kashmir, besides him being a representative of their political sentiments. They said that they know that people are deeply anguished by the harassment of Mirwaiz, urging them to stay calm and peaceful .They said that Mirwaiz or any member of APHC has nothing to do with the so called funding case and it is sheer vindictiveness on the part of authorities. 

Government committed to ensuring least inconvenience to civilian traffic

0

JAMMU, APRIL 7, 2019: The elaborate arrangements made by the Government for the convenience of the public on the National Highway 44 during the restricted travel period on NH, was quite successful on the first day of the traffic prohibition today.

As per the latest reports received from districts, the movement of civilian vehicles in Kashmir Division and Jammu Division remained normal in all interior roads except for the NH where only exempted categories of vehicles were seen plying. As per the reports gathered from the DCs of Pulwama, Anantnag, Budgam and Baramulla, special permission passes were given to 128, 210, 45 and 110 vehicles, totaling 493 vehicles, falling in the exempted categories. Passes were issued in Udhampur and Ramban also. These vehicles were given passes for traveling on the Highway.

Further, a very large number of vehicles were allowed to cross the NH at various crossings in all districts. In Srinagar, over 2000 civilian vehicles crossed Panthachowk towards various destinations along the National Highway. Further, normal civil traffic movement was observed in various areas including Tengpora, Shalteng, Parimpora, Nowgam, Batamaloo, Sanatnagar, Bemina Chowk, Hyderpora, Chanpora and Narbal Crossing where over 10,000 vehicles crossed the NH unhindered. In Anantnag, around 3000 vehicles crossed the NH at various crossings.

Many people used alternate roads, especially the old NH where available, and other internal routes to commute and also to reach Srinagar, thus completely avoiding the NH. It is pertinent to mention that students appearing in various exams also reached in time as their roll number slips were treated as passes. All emergency cases, medical or otherwise are being cleared without any delay. Doctors and businessmen who have to attend their establishments on the NH were

allowed without any problem. From the overall proceedings of the day, it appears that the movement of vehicles was hassle free, although heavier on alternate routes. It may be mentioned that the local administration made extensive arrangements to facilitate the movement of public through the provision of Travel Passes through a Nodal Officer in each district for covering (i) various emergencies, including medical, (ii) school buses, (iii) students appearing in any examination, (iv) Government employees on duty (iv) hospital staff on duty, (v) passengers travelling by air, (vi) political persons needing to campaign, etc. on production of requisite identification documents. Besides, over a 100 Executive Magistrates were on duty today along the NH from Baramulla to Udhampur from 5 a.m., to ensure smooth movement of Security Forces’ Convoy and also facilitate smooth civilian movement.

The Government stated that the regulation of civilian traffic during movement of Security Forces’ convoy had to be notified for two days a week, in the larger interest of security of everyone and appealed to people to extend full cooperation in the smooth regulation of traffic as was the case today. The restrictions are, in any case, applicable upto 31st May 2019 only. The total duration of prohibition is for 26 hours out of 168 hours in a week, which is 15% of the time. Further, the total number of restricted days is just 15 during this entire period. 8 of these are Sundays. Planned restrictions, with active facilitation of the public by the administration for exceptions and emergencies, is far more convenient to the public so that they can plan their movements in advance. As movements reduce, the restrictions will be relooked. The State Administration is committed to ensure the least inconvenience, particularly on the two notified days, i.e. Sundays and Wednesdays. This should set at rest any misgivings and also give the true situation on the ground on Day 1 of the restriction.